While <strong> and <em> are of course more semantically correct, there seem definite legitimate reasons to use the <b> and <i> tags for customer-written content.

Mar 4, 2009 · I heard you should define sizes and distances in your stylesheet with em instead of in pixels. So the question is why should I use em instead of px when defining styles in CSS? Is there a …

Dec 20, 2009 · Both of them emphasize text. The &lt;em&gt; tag shows text as italics, whereas &lt;strong&gt; makes it bold. Is this the only difference?

Jul 31, 2011 · The 'em' is a very useful unit in CSS, since it can adapt automatically to the font that the reader uses An EM is relative to the current element it is defined on. If you use relative sizes (like …

Jun 17, 2015 · cite & em is HTML 5 - standard, which insists in meaning. For a long time, old HTML (like ) is used for layout display. But the new standard requires that HTML should only consists of content, …

Jun 12, 2017 · strong y em, en cambio, marcan una diferencia en la fuerza o énfasis que se quiere dar a una palabra o frase sobre el texto completo. En un navegador tradicional la diferencia no se percibe, …

Dec 17, 2010 · The M-principle that an em is based on the letter M and is dependent on font is an often stated myth!! very succinctly describes exactly how ems and pixels relate. Using the letter M to …

em has the purpose of giving em phasis to the content. In practice emphasised content is typically displayed italicised, so the difference on the face of it is non-existing from a presentation standpoint. …

Aug 9, 2010 · Explains the concept of height in em units within CSS, providing insights and examples for better understanding.

Dec 30, 2013 · For scalable fonts, the font-size is a scale factor applied to the EM unit of the font. (Note that certain glyphs may bleed outside their EM box.) For non-scalable fonts, the font-size is …